The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has argued that women should not get screened for breast cancer until they reach age 50. And, at that time, they should only get screened with mammograms once every two years.
This has led many women to scoff at the idea. Even the task force says screening saves lives. It estimates , though, that about 1,900 women between ages 40 and 49 must be screened in order to save just one woman. But to save 1 woman, it would only require screening about 1,300 women ages 50 to 59. Thus, the argument goes — in my words — that it's not worth traumatizing 1,900 women in order to save just one.
But the counter argument goes that it's likely that most of the 1,900 women would gladly experience false positives, learn they do not have breast cancer and deal with worry if they knew that they were responsible for saving one life.
I was involved in a conversation with Dr. Denis Cortese, retiring national CEO of Mayo Clinic, when we entered a patient elevator at Mayo. As we talked, and Cortese expressed frustration with the recommendations of the task force, a woman in the elevator broke in and said, "what if I was that one woman?" In other words, if she was that one woman, but the government changes its screening recommendations so women under 50 don't get screened, she would not be diagnosed — and she would die.
So it's a question of whether you save lives versus whether you avoid discomfort for women who might get unnecessary biopsies.
Mayo Clinic, for its part, says it will keep doing annual mammograms for women, starting at age 40. Cortese said it's an easy decision for a physician. If screening saves lives, which screening of women 40 to 49 does, you do what's in the best interest of the patient.
You screen.
Pulse on Health
By Jeff Hansel, member Association of Health Care Journalists
Health Reporter for the Post-Bulletin newspaper, 18 1st Ave. S.E. in Rochester, Minnesota 55904
Recent Comments