80 percent of Rochester high school students graduate in four years
I recently learned that between 77% and 80% of Rochester high school students graduate in four years. Why is this so abysmal? Because if a student who starts in ninth grade does not graduate from that some school in four years, s/he has not graduated. If a student moves somewhere else and graduates, it doesn't matter. It still means that once again, Rochester schools have failed!

Does this mean that if another student moves INTO our district and graduates then we would somehow have the ability of graduating more than 100% of our students? In other words, does this weird counting standard somehow hurt and help the district?
Posted by: TheinBomb | 03/05/2010 at 08:58 PM
I once tried to get an answer to this question from the superintendents offie and never got a response, that is, of kids who start in rochester how many graduate vs those who may move into the district. Seems to me that is a valid question, if we invest in early education does it work in the long run.
Posted by: rayschmitz | 03/15/2010 at 06:04 PM
I'm not surprised that you didn't get a response, Ray. I do not know at what point in time a student coming into the district 'counts' for graduation. I will try to follow up on it with someone downtown.
Posted by: Julie Workman | 03/15/2010 at 10:55 PM