News Business Sports Entertainment Life Obituaries Opinion
Jobs Homes Cars Classifieds Shopping
Local Bloggers Cheap Tech Eco-Confessions Faceoff Furst Draft Kiger's Notebook Med City Movie Guy Pulse on Health Political Party

Search PB Blogs

Loading

« June 2011 | Main | August 2011 »

30 posts from July 2011

27 July 2011

'Before going off on the deep end ranting'

Another note regarding my wind power post, this one from a Zumbrota reader:


Dear Mr. Furst,
 
I am writing in response to your article/blog entitled, "Call it what it is:  An anti-wind power film.
 
First, have you been to a showing of this film, "WINDFALL"?  I have NOT but intend to do so.  My husband and I live in our retirement home within the footprint of the AWA Goodhue Wind project.  We, along with many of our neighbors and friends, truly are concerned citizens about the impacts of industrial wind energy in Goodhue Co.  Before going off on the deep end ranting about this film, I suggest you allow others to see it and make their own decisions.
 
The film is free.  You can come and listen and feel free to walk out at any time if you so wish.  The fact that a freewill offering box may be sitting on the table does NOT mean anyone has to give to it.  Freewill is freewill...and not obligatory!
 
So, may I suggest you attend one or both showings of "WINDFALL" and then say your piece.  We all have the freedom to our opinions.
 
Since the Post Bulletin has been actively following this wind project, I suggest you come and meet the "locals."  They are good people.   Thanks for listening.
 

My response:

Thanks for the note -- I don't think the blog post was a rant -- it was just to note that the organization presenting ("facilitating") the film is working against the Goodhue wind project and the film itself, based on everything available online about it, says it takes a negative view of wind power. That's it -- no other opinion about the film, the project or anything else. But as a news organization, it's certainly reasonable for us to point out that it's not an impartial organization presenting a neutral film...it's a documentary with a clear position on the issue...and until I read this review from the Washington Post, I didn't realize that the filmmaker has property in the N.Y. town that's the focus:

++
Faucets don’t spit fire in “Windfall,” making its local premiere Saturday at the Environmental Film Festival. But incendiary water may be the only side effect not associated with wind power in Laura Israel’s absorbing, sobering documentary about the lures and perils of green technology.

With the Oscar-nominated “Gasland” (and its flame-throwing plumbing) enlightening viewers on the environmental and public health implications of natural gas drilling, and with nuclear power’s reputation in meltdown as a global community turns an anxious gaze toward Japan, some hardy souls may see hope in wind power. After seeing “Windfall,” those optimists will probably emerge with their faith, if not shaken, at least blown strongly off course.

“Windfall” takes place in Meredith, N.Y., a once-thriving dairy-farming community of fewer than 2,000 tucked into a bucolic Catskills valley that is teetering between post-agricultural poverty and hip gentrification. When Irish energy company Airtricity offers leases to build windmills on some residents’ properties, the deals initially seem like a win-win. A little extra money in the pockets of struggling farmers, an environmentally sound technology, those graceful white wings languorously slicing the afternoon sky — what’s not to like?

Plenty, as the concerned residents in “Windfall” find out. Not only do the 400-foot, 600,000-pound turbines look much less benign up close, but research has suggested that their constant low-frequency noise and the flickering shadows they cast affect public health; what’s more, they’ve been known to fall, catch fire and throw off potentially lethal chunks of snow and ice.

Soon Meredith succumbs to drastic divisions between boosters, who see Airtricity’s offers as a godsend for the economically strapped community, and skeptics, who see the leases as little more than green-washed carpetbaggery. “Windfall” chronicles the ensuing, agonizing fight, which largely splits lifelong residents and the relatively new “downstaters,” who’ve moved in from Manhattan and want to keep their views and property values pristine.

Using artful collages of maps and signage, a rootsy soundtrack and crisp digital cinematography, Israel provides a vivid backdrop to “Windfall’s” most gripping story, the emotionally charged human conflict that  results in a genuine cliffhanger of a third act. Wisely letting Meredith’s residents speak for themselves, the filmmaker avoids simple good-guy-bad-guy schematics, instead enabling each side to state its case.

Israel, a film editor making her feature debut here, has owned a cabin in Meredith for more than 20 years, a fact never made clear in “Windfall,” which is, nonetheless, filmed with careful, dispassionate distance. In large part, the documentary follows Israel’s process of discovery. Although she wasn’t approached for a lease, she initially supported wind power in the community, she said in an interview. “I wanted a turbine on my property, which motivated me to learn more about it,” she explained. “A lot of the people in the film are illustrating the process I went through, from initial excitement to having it unravel as you find out more about the subject.”

Comparing the situation in Meredith with similar ones in other New York communities, Israel conveys an alarming portrait of small, economically vulnerable towns being cynically targeted by Big Wind — slick, savvy energy companies less interested in the public good than in profits, which are virtually ensured thanks to generous federal and state tax breaks, as well as the deep pockets of investment banks. “It’s not green energy,” notes one observer. “It’s greed.”

Meanwhile, in Meredith, a handful of earnest, common-sense heroes try to separate fact from hype, do the right thing and navigate thorny questions of civic progress by way of small-town democracy. The latter isn’t always pretty, as anyone who has attended a town hall or school board meeting knows. But “Windfall” makes it look exciting, inspiring and, most important, stubbornly enduring. Last year, the Environmental Film Festival helped launch “Gasland’s” grass-roots tour, during which the film pulled the veil from an otherwise opaque subject. With luck, “Windfall” will soon embark on a similar eye-opening journey. Catch it if you can.


++

There are many more reviews to choose from that are more pointed.

But my point with the blog post was simply, here's who's presenting the film, and here's what the film is.

I'd like to see the film and might get to the Zumbrota screening. I believe we'll have a reporter at the Goodhue event.

I'll also just say, we've covered this issue more thoroughly than any other news organization -- by a long shot -- and have done our best to get the facts out to the public. Among other things, we hosted a community forum, one of our Post-Bulletin Dialogues event, on the project several months ago, as you probably know.

Thanks for the note,
Jay

By the way, the documentary is NOT to be confused with a 2003 action thriller by the same name.

'Disgusting piece of journalism'

This reader takes exception to a wisecrack in the Faceoff column on the sports cover Friday. First, here's the top of that column, which is a weekly give-and-take (and sometimes mud-wrestling match) between two opinionated P-B sports writers.


FELDMAN: Hey, Helmet Hair, glad to have you aboard Faceoff this week. This isn't Points on the Purple, but it's fitting that you're with us this week, after our stuttering and stammering governor on Tuesday basically wished the Vikings well in Los Angeles. After stating for months that he supports getting a Vikings stadium done, Gov. Mark Dayton told us the issue likely won't get taken up until the regular legislative session begins on Jan. 24, 2012. The Vikings' Metrodome lease expires about two weeks later. So, will we be watching a lame-duck team at the re-roofed Dome this fall?

Here's the reader comment, which came with a clipping of that graf:

I thoroughly enjoy the Post-Bulletin delivered to my door every day.

This disgusting piece of journalism should demand a retraction.

I have never heard our governor Mark Dayton stutter and stammer. He is well-spoken; my impression is we have a well-spoken governor; the use of his picture in that article is reprehensible!

First, I appreciate this reader taking the time to write. And one might argue that it's bad form to take a personal swipe at the governor and run his smiling mug next to it.

That said, the governor's not the smoothest, most well-spoken politician in the state. I'm quite sure he'd agree with that. Does he "stutter and stammer"? Sometimes.

The Faceoff comment might be a low blow, but it's defensible.

I'm more offended by Dayton's political opponents (I'm talking about you, Tony Sutton, among others) who use code words to say the governor is off-balance, not quite all there, erratic, "a piece of work" and unstable. Even when Rudy Perpich's opponents called him "Governor Goofy," it wasn't as much a gut shot as the code language that's used about Dayton.

26 July 2011

'What is it Mormons don't tell?'

A note to the Answer Man, regarding Friday's column:

Dear Answer Man,
In Friday's Post-Bulletin edition, a question was posed regarding an electronic billboard ad displaying the web site, "WhatMormonsDontTell.com". In concluding your answer, you stated the ad was insensitive and divisive. What did you mean by those terms and how did you come to that conclusion? What is it Mormons don't tell? Is the web site accurately documenting its claims or not? I was puzzled why you recommended not going to the evangelical web site for answers but recommended the LDS web site instead? Isn't that biased against evangelicals and biased for Mormons to determine a conclusion before investigating all the evidence? Why not exercise our freedom to even-handedly research both and then draw our conclusions? How wise is that kind of counsel from... "The Answer Man"?
Full of Questions

The Answer Man spake thusly:

Thanks for this, but it's just my opinion...it's pretty unusual for one church/faith organization to challenge or raise suspicions about another -- especially in the present context, when the leader of a Rochester church calls the Mormon faith a "cult."

For my money, I think it's unusual that the LDS website is Mormon.org. I thought that term for describing members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints was not preferred. Load the site and the first image that comes up is a guy speeding along on a motorcycle (no helmet), with the headline, "Breaking the mold."

 

Call it what it is: An anti-wind power film

Images

There's a screening of a film called "Windfall" in Goodhue on Thursday and in Zumbrota on Aug. 4, as a story in today's edition says.

It's a documentary on wind power, and you might assume it's anti-wind power. More on that in a second.

The story initially said, "The showing of the film is not sponsored by any group by design, in order to make sure everyone feels welcome, including both supporters and opponents of wind development. However, the showing is facilitated by the Coalition for Sensible Siting, a nonprofit organization that supports community opposition of industrial wind power generation. The showing was paid for by a private donation."

We later edited that down to take out the "make sure everyone feels welcome" line. And I'm not sure what the distinction is between "sponsored" and "facilitated" in this context, but we let that go.

Here's how the organization describes itself:

The Coalition for Sensible Siting is a Minnesota nonprofit corporation dedicated to raise and provide financial support to further citizens' voices in the industrial wind arena...

The Coalition's current top priority is paying legal bills for the AWA Goodhue contested Case hearing. The outcome will determine whether local governments and citizens have any rights related to industrial Wind Energy in Minnesota.

Citizens provided the time, energy, research, determination and cash to get to this historic point.  It is a major accomplishment.  Our relentless participation has gone largely unnoticed by Minnesotans outside Goodhue County.  If you pay taxes or use electricity, this effects you. We welcome financial, scientific, intellectual and personal contributions towards our efforts.  Help us change Minnesota's Energy future from government of the lobbyist, by the lawyers, for special corporate interests back to government of the people, by the people, for the people.

So you might expect it will be a fundraiser, by the way. The organization has a Zumbrota post office box, by the way, but no names or phone number that I can find.

I think I know who's behind the website and organization, but need to check it out.

Regarding the movie, here's how it's described in short on its ominous webpage: The film "exposes the dark side of wind energy development and the potential for highly profitable financial scams."

25 July 2011

Tough climb when you're in a hurry

Pic12646
Not sure if this is a legit sighting in our area, but a reader sent it to the Answer Man, who wrote recently about whether it's legal to use an old toilet as a flower pot in Rochester.


After your column on using a "toilet" as a flower pot I thought you would
find the following humorous.

This “outdoor facility” was “captured” near Courtland, MN., about 100 miles
                           west of Rochester.

Apparently the snow is very deep in the winter in these parts!!

The A-Man is seeking more details and might follow up in his column this week.

22 July 2011

Jeff Reinartz column in Austin edition today raises the specter of "Big Brother ... goose-stepping up to (parents') door" to help them keep their kids from getting fat.

I don't want to hear any complaints from Republicans


At least for a while...we ran six photos in Wednesday's paper from the special session, one a general shot of the House chamber, one mug of a state administrator, and FOUR of Republican lawmakers. Not one DFLer to be seen (or at least identified).

We need to be more careful about photo choice, obviously. DFLers were more or less there, too.

21 July 2011

Liebling statement on special session

DFL Rep. Tina Liebling put out this statement today:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Ted Modrich (651) 296-5809
 
July 21, 2011
 
STATEMENT ON SPECIAL SESSION
 
ST. PAUL — The Minnesota Legislature held a Special Legislative Session called by Governor Dayton on July 19. Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL – Rochester) was excused from the Special Session.
 
Rep. Liebling issued the following statement.
 
“I regret having missed the Special Session. My 25th wedding anniversary trip to Alaska had been scheduled months in advance and planned for well after a budget agreement should have been made. I hadn’t expected the longest shutdown in our state’s history.
 
“The Special Session was also called on very short notice, beginning only 3 hours after it had been called. On such short notice, there was no possible way for me to get to St. Paul in time. Throughout, I have remained in contact with legislative leaders and the governor’s office, have reviewed the bills, and continue to communicate with my constituents.”
-30-

Whether t'is nobler to turn up the thermostat

Regarding the Answer Man column on whether it makes more sense to turn up the AC while you're away at work:


talked to my air conditioner guy about this very thing. I like my house to be 73 degrees at night, but I used to routinely turn it up to 76 or 77 while I'm gone during the day.

He said it's more efficient to just leave it set at 73. Otherwise, it works too hard trying to get the temp back down.

It's a high-efficiency new system. Which, by the way, has broken down twice in the four years we've owned it. But that's another story, involving electrocuted wildlife.

More on the heat index

Regarding the Answer Man item in yesterday's paper, here's a note from retired IBM engineer Nathaniel C. Anderson:

I was talking with my sister in Fort Myers Beach, Fla., and she had never heard of a "dew point" but was familiar with relative humidity and wanted to know the relationship between the two.

I did a small sample regression analysis and found:

    (Dew point/Temperature)/1.2(tilde) = Relative humidity

I do enjoy your column!

This is way over the Answer Man's head, but maybe it makes sense to you.