The Washington Monthly piece on the University of Minnesota Rochester is a great marketing piece for UMR -- more hyperbole than may be appropriate at this point, but maybe that's what sells a story about Minnesota to D.C. editors.
Among the details that stand out, to anyone familiar with Rochester:
The description of UMR Chancellor Steve Lehmkuhle: "Tall and balding with a genial affect and a neat moustache..."
Can't disagree that Steve is tall, balding and genial. I'm not sure why his mustache needed to be described as "neat," however.
Demographics of Mayo patients: This is pretty funny..."Fortunately, Rochester was eager for a new university to create jobs and liven up a city center whose restaurants and stores mostly served elderly visitors to Mayo."
That might come as a surprise to the thousands of younger-than-elderly patients as well as the patrons of downtown restaurants and bars. The writer, Kevin Carey, might have had a good time at Thursdays on First last night, or maybe the Peace Plaza jam tonight at Martinis.
Just this week, we had another story about how downtown is getting downright rowdy, at least by Rochester standards.
Lectures are harmful: "Traditional college instruction -- epitomized by the lecture -- is largely a process of orally transmitting facts from the brain of the teacher to a student. It's a tremendously inefficient method -- even harmful."
I'll put this in the hyperbole column.
How inexpensive UMR is: The story goes on at some length about how inexpensive UMR is, compared with, oh, the main campus in Minneapolis, Winona State University, etc. Of course, UMR offers limited programming, has plans for building more infrastructure and so on, but you'd think this is a cost-neutral enterprise in Rochester.
Not sure of the accuracy of this statement -- we'll check it: "The cost of UMR's planned expansion to 1,500 students by 2015 will come entirely from student tuition, which is currently the standard University of Minnesota rate of $11,976 per year."
That's a lot of students -- I'll assume that the vast majority will be part-time -- and will tuition really cover it? Seems questionable.
Winona State's library: The reporter takes potshots at Winona State for being organized like, well, most good universities. "Although it's not a research university, it has dutifully divided its faculty among five colleges and scores of departments, 17 in the College of Liberal Arts alone. It also takes a traditional approach to buildings," meaning it built a new library several years ago. "The cost to Minnesota taxpayers: $17.7 million, plus annual expenses for maintenance and the 17 (employees)."
UMR pretty much has no library -- its "entire print collection fits in the kind of small metal bookcase you can buy at Office Depot for $129. The bottom two shelves are empty."
So -- the point is -- what? Winona State has thousands of students who pay a lot of money for an education in many disciplines and departments, compared with the narrow focus at UMR. It's a high-quality institution with a strong liberal arts tradition and a long history of serving students -- and businesses that need smart, well-trained employees.
Why whack WSU to make a point about a start-up like UMR, where expenses are tiny because there are relatively few students and programs?
I'll bet UMR fills those two bottom shelves one of these days, and might even wish for some type of library when they grow to an enrollment of 9,300, comparable to WSU.
We eat dinner early: The most puzzling line might be this one, though: "Lehmkuhle was initially worried about recruiting students to an unknown university in a flat, cold city filled with people who eat dinner at 4:30 in the afternoon."
Leaving aside the "flat, cold city" crack, do you eat dinner at 4:30 in the afternoon? Do you know anyone who does?
Recent Comments