Education Notebook

Article: Rochester students tally stagnant Stanford standardized test scores (say that five times fast)

Students in Rochester public schools registered stagnant test scores on this year’s Stanford Achievement Test, a popular standardized test given to Rochester’s second through ninth-grade students.

Below is the rest of the story that will appear in Thursday's print edition, as well as a file with all Stanford test results since 2005. This is the story mentioned in Wednesday's story about the five-year plan.

'The proficiency illusion': Report says profiency targets keep getting easier

 Today comes a study from the Fordham Institute on the differences in "No Child Left Behind proficiency" compared by state. For example, Minnesota's MCA-II tests are much different than the tests across the border in Wisconsin.

Here's an example. Check out these two questions, both come from fourth grade state tests (albeit different states):

Which sentence tells a fact, not an opinion?
•Cats are better than dogs.
•Cats climb trees better than dogs.
•Cats are prettier than dogs.
•Cats have nicer fur than dogs.

----
Now, from a different state:

Read the excerpt from “How Much Land Does a Man Need?”by Leo Tolstoy.
So Pahomwas well contented, and everything would have been right if the neighboring peasants would only not have trespassed on his wheatfields and meadows. He appealed to them most civilly, but they still went on: now the herdsmen would let the village cows stray into his meadows, thenhorses from the night pasture would get among his corn. Pahomturned them out again and again, and forgave their owners, and for a long time he forbore to prosecute anyone. But at last he lost patience and complained to the District Court.

What is a fact from this passage?
•Pahomowns a vast amount of land.
•The peasant’s intentions are evil.
•Pahomis a wealthy man.
•Pahom complained to the District Court.

----

Wow... That's fascinating. The first entry was from Wisconsin (*insert Wisconsin joke here*), while the second question came from Massachusetts. This might be story fodder coming up here. At any rate, thought we should open up the discussion about this.

For those interested in the study, here it is:

LINK: The Proficiency Illusion study

Rochester's ACT scores dip, still pace national, state averages

Here's a link to today's story about Rochester's ACT scores. A hat tip goes to Lukas Matern, who scored a perfect 36 on the exam.

LINK: Student aces test in 'the pursuit of perfection'

Articles: Does No Child Left Behind hinder a school helping students who have been left behind?

Rochester Off-Campus Charter School was formed to offer school to the under-served. Specifically, the school charged that it would first enroll students who:
• are at least one year behind in grade level,
• pregnant or already a parent,
• chemically dependent,
• victims of physical or sexual abuse,
• homeless in the past six months,
• have experienced mental health problems,
• or have been expelled by a school district.

Taken another way, they help the students who have for whatever reason have been unable to find success at other public schools.

And while charter schools have been getting beat up by pundits and education experts lately, this school has been in operation since 1993. So does it make sense to penalize a school by the rules of No Child Left Behind, when this school only enrolls those who have been essentially left behind?

It's an interesting debate.

Here are the articles in today's paper:

Do standards penalize school that helps those left behind?

Rochester Off-Campus enters 'pre-restructuring' penalty

[PB]

Sound off: No Comment Left Behind (NCLB, AYP reader reactions)

Since you can't throw a rock without hitting a news story about No Child Left Behind and MCA-II scores, I figured it would be a decent time to show some recent reader comments...

Some interesting points being brought up here about parental involvement versus school quality, and some who urge reform of No Child Left Behind.

The following comments came from these recent articles:

Small schools reign large on AYP

13 Rochester schools cited for not hitting No Child Left Behind benchmarks

MCA-II scores from area charter schools

State science scores improve, but nearly half still aren't proficient

Also, thanks again to all of the new readers checking in -- don't be afraid to comment if you want to respond to these, either. (As always, I hope we maintain a level of respect and decorum here. Inclusion of these comments is merely to spark debate - not ignite name calling. Inclusion of comments absolutely does not reflect the views of the writer (me), the Post-Bulletin, or any employees therein.)

Questions? Concerns? E-mail

On to the comments:

Peace
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/12/2009 at 8:47:53 PM

We used to live in Byron and the schools there were EXCELLENT compared to the ones our kids have attended in Rochester.  And the ones they have attended here are supposedly some of the best in the district.

---

---

mamabear
Chatfield, MN

Posted on 8/12/2009 at 11:58:16 AM

I have a different view from all that I’ve read online the last couple of days. My personal experience with MCAs is that my child passes all the MCAs with no trouble but has difficulty with normal classroom work. The teachers at his school focus so much on the MCAs that when it comes to normal work, we have trouble. Figure that one out.

---

---

YouAreWro
ng
Rochester, MN

 Posted on 7/22/2009 at 4:14:44 PM

The state wants a test all kids should pass.

Then the state should have a curriculum all schools use that matches the test.

I don’t trust the state one bit. I will bet there are a ton of questions the kids have never seen before.

The state of Minnesota should have a state curriculum.

In fact, when Timmy moves from Minneapolis to Rochester, he will just pick up where he left off because everyone is doing the same thing.

This concept though makes too much sense and takes the power out of the hands of the state. It gives the teachers too much power and we can’t have that.

---

---

tcalexand
er
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 9:39:56 AM

Maybe it’s time for the government to rethink no-child left behind.  It’s got a huge flaw in it implies that schools are soley responsible for student outcomes.  This is in no way the case.  Student outcomes are determined by the students, the parents, and the schools in that order. 

A much better solution for no child left behind is to require parents to be responsible for their children learning.  Successful students are provided oppertunities and discipline developed through the home to make the whole education oppertunity work.  We for instance do not let our kids play video games until their homework is done and checked.  We also routinely follow up with the school (online) to watch their progress.  If the progress is not sufficient, the spend more time on their homework and the expense of their personal entertainment.  The key is we are ACTIVELY INVOLVED.

IMO if a student is failing the parent needs to make a concious choice to provide the student more guidance outside the school.  If they will not do so willingly, charging them a fee to provide additional mentoring to their student is very reasonable. 

Education is very much that old statement - “you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink”.  Same thing, you can bus kids all over the country to give them an education but if they don’t feel like participating and their parents are parenting you can spend trillions of dollars per student and they still won’t learn.

---

---

chimin
rochester, mn

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 10:31:10 AM

Exactly, school is impt, teachers play a fundamental role, but their hands are tied if the parents or guardians don’t support/reinforce the respect and need for a good, solid education. I am a success story of inner city Chicago Public Schools and it was primarily because my parents stressed the need for education.  As an elementary student, my parents checked my homework daily, in high school they discussed grades and school with me, but did not understand the content .. but they still engaged.

---

---

beekeeper
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 11:00:37 AM

Lincoln staff worked hard all year to get kids and parents to use Study Island, and it has paid off two years in a row. I don’t think it is Study Island per se that did the trick, although it probably helped. More pertinent, I think, was the attitude that mastering the material is important.

---

---

begivesee
13
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/12/2009 at 11:17:49 AM

Sideline - Lincoln K-8 serves both elementary and secondary (middle school) students.  Lincoln students in grades 6-8 take the same MCA tests as all other district students in grades 6-8. And these Lincoln middle school students - like their peers at Willow Creek - also made AYP. In fact, Lincoln’s proficiency rate in 2009 was higher in both reading and math than at Willow Creek.  In the current environment, any school that helps its students be proficient deserves congratulations. 

---

---

rvnsea
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/12/2009 at 7:26:22 AM

Profile: The parents and staff do have the job of helping the kids but the kids need to help themselves. Everyone involved in this need to work at it.

---

---

BT
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 11:37:33 PM

... People do need to know that Riverside does have excellent staff at all levels.  They really do!  I also feel they have many kids of all geographical demographics working hard to learn to the best of their ability.  And we also have a group of students that simply do not care!  Have we lost that level of respect of our students to teachers?  Authority?  The law?  Many and I mean many respect it but we have a volume of individuals at all age levels that do not. 

But even #535 can not deny the fact that we also have discipline issues that must be addressed and done so on a CONSISTENT basis!

Here is a comparison to think about; Our curriculum is changing in that what kids were being taught in 4th grade a few years back, well now its taught in grades two or three. Well sadly, the flip side of that coin is that some of the discipline issues that were happening in middle and high school ages are now happening at the elementary school!  We all hear of sad cases of young and I mean very young people getting caught up in crimes we could never imagine.

---

---

YouAreWro
ng
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 9:19:53 PM

One small subgroup determines if you made it. If 10 kids are in a group and 3 of them won’t do their homework or get out of bed to come to school, that school is listed.

---

---

Just_Me
Small Town, MN

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 10:55:50 AM

I agree that parents need to be involved, and I am a very involved parent.  But, we cannot ignore the fact that are some teachers and districts that need change, and I’ve been in that situation and tried for more than three years to work with the school and got no where.  Long story short, I ended up transferring my child and he has completely excelled in a new school, and the difference in the schools is unbelievable!

---

---

Commentat
or
Rochester, MN

Posted on 8/11/2009 at 10:18:36 AM

... It is the active parents that have the students who are striving to do their best.  The parents who don’t care about education (thorugh their actions, not their words) are the ones whose child doesn’t care about education either.  That is why none of the choice schools are on the failing list (the parents care enough to find a school they think will be good for their child).  Longfellow does not count because until this year, it has been considered a neighborhood school as well as a choice school.

---

---

MCA-II, AYP numbers for local charter schools (Studio, ROC, Math & Science Academy)

An interested reader asked me for the figures of local charter schools. Proving that the squeakiest wheel gets the oil, here are the figures. (The image is too small, but it shows at regular size if you click and view it in a new window.)

Here are the adequate yearly progress totals for each charter school:

Studio Academy made AYP.

Rochester Off-Campus Charter High School did not make AYP.
Cited for:
• Math proficiency (All students)
• Attendance

Rochester Math and Science Academy (formerly Adam Abdulle Academy) did not make AYP.
Cited for:
• Reading participation and proficiency (All students, black students, English-learning students, low-income students),
• Math participation (All students, black students, English-learning students, low-income students).

One interesting point about RMSA. It has to be one of the only schools in the state that isn't rated on white students, mainly because the school enrolls fewer than 20 white students.

Another person might ask, how did Studio Academy reach AYP when 24 percent of students passed math? Other schools had a much higher rate, but didn't pass. The answer is that the Studio started much lower -- last year only 9 percent of students rated proficient on math.

Article: Small schools reign large on No Child Left Behind benchmarks

In today's Post-Bulletin, we examine how No Child Left Behind's annual benchmarks seem to leave larger schools disadvantaged.

The Minnesota Department of Education released this year’s list of schools that are meeting adequate yearly progress benchmarks as laid out by the federal No Child Left Behind law, which states that all students need to reach proficiency by 2014. First, students take state tests in reading and math called MCA-IIs.

Then, those scores are broken down by demographic subgroup and compared to the previous year. The benchmarks, called adequate yearly progress, rise each year. The subgroups are broken down by students of white, black, Hispanic, Asian and American Indian backgrounds, in addition to low-income students, special education students and English language learners. If one group doesn’t meet AYP, the district is cited.

But smaller school districts might not have enough students to be counted in those classifications, leaving them more able to succeed in AYP. This shouldn't cast blame on those smaller schools -- it's no fault of their own that they are successful. A lot of hard work goes into making sure those students are achieving.

But as the article points out, of the 50 largest school districts in Minnesota, only three made AYP. And those districts are teaching some incredibly gifted and knowledgeable students (look to Rochester, which has the only presidential scholars in the state, for instance).

An interesting point was brought up by a friend that should be passed on for debate: Adequate yearly progress and MCA-IIs basically test to see if students can jump over a small hurdle. It shows the amount of students who can jump over that hurdle, but it doesn't show how high students can jump, which is something that needs to be considered.

While there needs to be focus on the fact that many students aren't reaching proficiency, we shouldn't forget that a lot of school districts are still educating a lot of high-performing kids and young adults. Just because a school district is cited by the state, it isn't necessarily "failing."

(Education Commissioner Alice Seagren noted as much in an interview on Monday, saying she has never used the word "failing" when talking about schools not meeting AYP benchmarks.)

So can we say one school is worse than another, when some smaller buildings have a better shot at not being cited?

ANYWAY, here's today's article:

http://news.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews_story.asp?z=2&a=411568

By Elliot Mann / emann[at]postbulletin.com

While 45 percent of Minnesota’s schools found themselves unable to meet No Child Left Behind benchmarks this year, four small southeastern Minnesota school districts haven’t had that problem.

Ever.

The Minnesota Department of Education released this year’s list of schools that are meeting adequate yearly progress benchmarks as laid out by the federal No Child Left Behind law, which states that all students need to reach proficiency by 2014. First, students take state tests in reading and math called MCA-IIs.

Then, those scores are broken down by demographic subgroup and compared to the previous year. The benchmarks, called adequate yearly progress, rise each year. The subgroups are broken down by students of white, black, Hispanic, Asian and American Indian backgrounds, in addition to low-income students, special education students and English language learners. Since the annual list started in 2003, Byron, Lanesboro, Mabel-Canton and Spring Grove school districts have always made AYP.

Byron Superintendent of Schools Wendy Shannon credited plans to align the district’s course work to state standards, as well as moving focused remedial instruction into the hours of the school day.
That has been one major focus of Rochester’s efforts to increase student achievement, too.

Yet with rising targets, more schools continue to be cited by the state. Of those schools, many are the state’s largest. None of Minnesota’s 20 largest school districts made AYP this year. Of the state’s 50 largest districts, only three made it unscathed. Those were: Minnetonka (22), Farmington (32) and Hastings (38). Those 50 districts comprise 499,667 students, more than half of the more than 835,000 students in Minnesota public schools.

Those large schools include those receiving accolades in other measures, though.
Edina public schools are often the darling of the school rankings circuit — U.S. News and World Report last December ranked them as Minnesota’s top school — but that school system was cited for missing sufficient yearly progress.

Likewise, Rochester’s Century High School and Mayo High School received awards from that magazine, but they were also cited by the state. As a district, Rochester was named for missing AYP, too. Byron, which carries an enrollment of 1,689 students, was rated this year by scores of its white, special education and low-income students. Rochester was judged by those groups, in addition to students of American Indian, Asian, Hispanic and black backgrounds, and English-language learners. If one group doesn’t meet AYP, the district is cited.

So are larger schools, with more diverse groups of students, more likely to miss AYP?
“You really kind of hit the nail on the head,” Minnesota Education Commissioner Alice Seagren said.

She said the state holds those larger schools accountable to make the standard, but the larger schools carry a larger chance to be cited.

Rochester schools are characterized by more than 300 different cells, based on the different school buildings and populations. Within those, Superintendent of Rochester schools Romain Dallemand said, only 41 were cited.

But even the schools that have made AYP aren’t necessarily popping the Champagne corks.
As Kasson-Mantorville’s Test Coordinator Marilyn Bongers said, school districts don’t think about if they will be cited for AYP, it’s when. Kasson-Mantorville public schools made annual progress for the fifth-straight year.

“We don’t celebrate too hard about it,” Superintendent of Kasson-Mantorville schools Peter Grant said. “We pat each other on the back and get back to work.”
The administrators at the non-cited schools concede that No Child Left Behind needs to be reformed in some way.

Grant criticized the standard. No other entity is held to a 100 percent success rate, he said.
“Even the Mayo Clinic knows that — they can’t be 100 percent proficient,” Grant said. “We can’t be 100 percent proficient. We’re dealing with teenagers. It isn’t realistic.”

Grant also criticized the fact that different states carry different standards. Shannon echoed the call of many area superintendents, Grant included, and said No Child Left Behind should carry a growth model perspective.

“Your growth model is more comprehensive,” Shannon said. “It’s more of look at how a student is doing, in terms of student progress.”

Byron, Lanesboro, Mabel-Canton and Spring Grove continue their best Don Larsen (Mark Buehrle?) impressions on No Child Left Behind's annual benchmarks

Four local school districts remain perfect on No Child Left Behind's adequate yearly progress. Since the measure was established in 2003, Byron, Lanesboro, Mabel-Canton and Spring Grove public school districts have each passed every year.

While No Child Left Behind's benchmark system can be debated, and a person can argue that larger schools are worse off due to student sample sizes (an article today and in the following bog post will examine just that), we should still tip our hats to the districts who have been able to make AYP, especially those who have done so every year.

Here are some other districts who have made it several years, with the years missed in parenthesis:

Kasson-Mantorville (2005)
Lewiston-Altura (2004)
Southland (2006)
Zumbrota-Mazeppa (2006).

(Apologies to the youngins who aren't familiar with Don Larsen, or the old-timers who bristle at putting Mark Buehrle in the same sentence.)

13 of Rochester's school buildings cited on No Child Left Behind list

The results are in -- almost half of the state's schools were cited for failing to meet No Child Left Behind progress benchmarks.

The state Minnesota Department of Education on Monday night released this year’s list of schools not making adequate yearly progress, one of the components of the oft-debated federal No Child Left Behind legislation. That law states that all children should be proficient by 2014 and the AYP list shows which schools are making sufficient progress toward that goal. Schools are rated by racial and demographic subgroups and failure by one of those groups to make the progress benchmarks can land the entire district on the list.

AYP uses MCA-II scores from reading and math. (MCA-IIs, or Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments-Series II, are state tests given to students each year.)

Last year, 931 schools made the list. (In traditional education-speak, they have dubbed this "adequate yearly progress.") This year, 1,048 were named. In Rochester, 13 regular school sites were named.  (Alternative Learning Programs and Burr Oak were excluded, since those buildings involve a small population and ALC's traditionally fail to meet AYP guidelines. Those students traditionally enroll at-risk students.)

Now, if your or your child's school is listed, it's probably not time to panic. (Alice Seagren actually says that in our article today.) The larger the school is and the more diverse the school population, the higher the chance the school lands on the AYP list. Of the top 20 school districts in the state, all were listed in some form on AYP.

(I have complied a list of our local schools that have always made AYP, which I hope to put together for a second-day article.)

Here are the local districts who were not cited on the list and made adequate yearly progress: Byron, Caledonia, Dover-Eyota, Fillmore Central, Hayfield, Kasson-Mantorville, Kingsland, Lanesboro, Lewiston-Altura, Mabel-Canton, Southland, Spring Grove, Wabasha-Kellogg, Zumbrota-Mazeppa.

While no one should be jumping out of windows, these tests do show that certain underserved populations are not meeting progress goals, for whatever reason. But for these tests to make any sort of difference, the discussions now need to turn from who isn't achieving, to why they aren't achieving.

Here is a .pdf file of the Rochester schools that have been cited this year.

Here is a .pdf file of all of the southeastern Minnesota schools that have been cited this year.

Here is a .xls file of all school data statewide, provided by Minnesota Department of Education. (Microsoft Exce file, works in OpenOffice, too.)

For some reason, the article still isn't online, so here it is (I'll remove this and put the link here once it goes live):

Some schools fall short of No Child Left Behind's moving target

By Elliot Mann / Post-Bulletin
Thirteen Rochester public schools — along with 46 percent of Minnesota’s schools statewide — have been named to this year’s list of schools not making yearly progress goals.

Two Rochester schools have landed on the list enough consecutive times that parents at the school can now choose to send them to another district site. Those schools are Pinewood and Riverside Central elementary schools. Parents will be presented with the choice of sending their children to other specific schools. However, Franklin Elementary School, which was cited last year, came off the list this year.
The state Minnesota Department of Education on Monday night released this year’s list of schools not making adequate yearly progress, one of the components of the oft-debated federal No Child Left Behind legislation. That law states that all children should be proficient by 2014 and the AYP list shows which schools are making sufficient progress toward that goal.

Education Commissioner Alice Seagren said that from 2006 to 2009, the state has seen constant gains, even if the numbers aren’t keeping pace with No Child Left Behind requirements.

“The bottom line for me is about half made AYP and about half did not,” Seagren said. “There’s not a need to panic though. ... We’re seeing steady progress. Is it fast enough in some subgroups? No, but we’re not seeing our state going backward.”

Schools are rated by racial and demographic subgroups and failure by one of those groups to make the progress benchmarks can land the entire district on the list. As a district, Rochester was cited in these populations this year: reading proficiency of English language learners, math proficiency of black students and low-income students, and both reading and math proficiency of special education students.

Superintendent of Rochester public schools Romain Dallemand said schools here are performing well in the big picture. Among all district sites, Rochester is rated by more than 300 different demographic categories.

“We’re looking at 316 categories and we’re only cited in 41,” Dallemand said. “That’s an 88 percent success rate. That’s very good.”

No school left behind on list of 'No Child Left Behind' adequate yearly progress

Alright gang, (c) Larry King

Tomorrow we'll have the list of every school and sub-population that the state has cited as not making sufficient yearly progress. This is all part of the federal No Child Left Behind law, which states that all children must be proficient by 2014.

While the numbers haven't been released, more schools are estimated to be on the list than ever before, as close to half of the state's schools are expected to be listed in one form or another.

Basically, this list takes the MCA-II scores from earlier this summer and rates the progress from last year. If populations aren't making growth, they are cited as needed additional help. If the schools cited receive federal funding, the feds can eventually pull that funding. However, other penalties range from giving parents the choice to switch schools (low end of penalties), versus widespread restructuring (severe penalty).

More to come. E-mail any questions.